Category: Photography

  • I’m Sorry You’re a Veteran

    I’m Sorry You’re a Veteran

    A Portrait in Words and Photographs of My Uncle Mark Bird, a Vietnam War Veteran

    Mark Bird at his home in Albuquerque in November 2024, standing in front of a painting of his land in Moriarty, NM, by his partner, artist Linda Sugar.

    On Veteran’s Day, I took my uncle, a Vietnam War veteran, and his partner, a Vietnam War protestor, to coffee in downtown Albuquerque. Trump had just been elected for a second presidential term, and our conversation waxed political, full of anxiety and hope. A few days earlier, I had asked my uncle to be the subject of a photography project in which I thought about what it looked like to have a life after being drafted into the Vietnam War.

    Following the coffee, we walked a few blocks to The Federal Building on Gold Street, the site he remembers reporting to as a recruit in the 1960s or ’70s (his exact timeline eludes me). I snapped a few pictures while he milled around the attractive brick structure. Then, when I got home, I realized I had forgotten to put a memory card in my camera. Those pictures are now lost in everything but my memory of taking them.

    Photos from the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Museum in Angel Fire, NM, of American military members killed in Vietnam with accompanying biographical sketches penned by Dr. David Westphall, co-founder of the memorial. The top is a photo of Leonard Carabeo, which notes: “A service man of courage and rare self-sacrifice, he displayed at all times the most tactful cooperation while aiding the Armed Forces of the Republic of Vietnam to repel the Red wave.” Below is Dennis Michael Mead, a Marine from Indiana.
    A poem by Doug Scott is engraved on a plaque outside the chapel at the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Angel Fire, NM. It reads: “THE WORDS / DEAR MOM AND DAD / ARE WRITTEN / NOW WHAT? / HE CAN’T TELL THEM WHAT HE IS SEEING. / HE CAN’T TELL THEM WHAT HE IS DOING. / HIS EYES / SEE A FOREIGN LAND / HIS HEART / SEES THE OTHER SIDE OF THE WORLD.”

    My uncle is notoriously and understandably reticent on the subject of the war. The fact that he had been involuntarily sent to teach English in a place where he also undoubtedly watched people die and get tortured and raped never occurred to me as I grew up. I thought of him as my uncle—the bachelor who lived in a hovel full of yard-sale trinkets. Occasionally, while my family lived in Wyoming, he would show up at our doorstep, staying for weeks in order to build us an enclosed porch or to accompany us on a road trip to Yellowstone.

    Of course, I know now that he will probably never feel like an innocent witness to the horrors that transpired in Vietnam.

    A display case in the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Museum in Angel Fire, NM, featuring postcards, currency, stamps, phrasebooks, dolls, cigarettes, sandals, and other Vietnamese items.

    We developed a special connection over time, finding ourselves ideologically aligned as well as intellectually curious about the same books, films, and art. We wrote each other irregular letters. On one of his visits, he gave me a weathered copy of Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird. Perhaps on the same visit, we rented The Scent of Green Papaya from the local Blockbuster, a film I found painfully slow and boring as a teenager. I didn’t then make the connection that it was a Vietnamese film about the pre-war life of a young girl who does housework in Saigon.

    War didn’t mean much to me in the 1990s—it was way over my head and before my time. It happened in the past for complicated and unavoidable reasons. Additionally, it was the stuff of classic literature and earnest Hollywood features like Forest Gump, which I can still hear my father weeping through when we saw it in the theater. I was nine years old–old enough to learn about PG-13 depictions of the Vietnam War, transformed into a romantic comedy.

    Vietnam Elegy by Denham Clements is displayed in the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Museum in Angel Fire, NM. In a title card accompanying the painting, Clements notes: “I left Vietnam over 50 years ago . . . but it has not left me.” He dedicates this piece to his fellow Vietnam veterans and their families.

    The narrative about war is endlessly malleable, often pleasurably aestheticized, and so capable of rendering the grotesque and macabre inextricable from beauty. A classic and engaging tale, war is the avenue by which good conquers evil. It ennobles us as individuals, “builds men,” and produces prideful nations. Proudest of all are the victors, who subsequently rise as members of a powerful global elite.

    Not to out myself as a stereotypical millennial, but the events of 9/11 certainly brought the idea of war—and the US as a war-mongering nation—to the forefront of my mind. Initially, I didn’t know what to think as I watched the Twin Towers fall on a bulky television in my high school world history class. The event and the ensuing Iraq War felt like an anachronism. How could we find another war necessary after waging so many excessive, unsuccessful, and unpopular ones in the past?

    Needless to say, the only outcome of this conflict was the death of tens of thousands of Iraqis and Americans. The survivors who returned home, traumatized and maimed, found it hard to integrate back into society. Now, most of us agree the war was needless. There were never any weapons of mass destruction, and the whole enterprise seemed to be a way to dangerously extend executive power and enrich Halliburton–the oil and gas company in which Dick Cheney was heavily invested.1

    A book found in the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Museum in Angel Fire, NM.
    My uncle in front of his property in Moriarty, NM, in November 2024. All of the photographs I took of him and this location remain untitled.

    In the background of this international drama, my uncle was toiling on a small plot of land in Moriarty, New Mexico. Like many Vietnam veterans, he didn’t come back feeling transformed into a hero. He felt “changed”—as many veterans comment about going through war—but the ways in which the war changed him will forever dodge articulation. Men like him were also met with the vitriol of anti-war protestors who blamed them for fulfilling a fate many of them regretted or were unwillingly conscripted into.2 As a result, some chose to retreat into remote hermitages. I’m sure others took their own lives, either quickly or through the slow death of drug and alcohol addiction.

    My uncle behind a tree in Moriaty.

    After several years of listlessly meandering through South America and the East Coast, my uncle settled in his own hermitage near his parents in Moriarty, a rural town east of Albuquerque. He had hoped that one day Moriarty might grow and develop. It never did.

    As a construction worker who specialized in plaster and adobe, his place in Moriarty became the lab where he tried out different techniques. Soon, elements of prefab houses melded into adobe edifices with Earthship-like tire insulation and walls punctured with glass bottles. Colorful tiles decorated sporadically chosen wall spaces. Various genres of antiques spilled out of each room and into the yard, dissolving the boundary between outside and inside. Cars, trucks, trailers, RVs, and industrial machinery choked his lawn.

    My uncle through the window of one of many vintage trucks still dispersed across his land.
    The side of one of my uncle’s “Franken-house” constructions with an inaccessible door hovering above an absent stoop. To the right is a block of his tile art.
    A truck bed on my uncle’s land in Moriarty, full of found-object art treasures such as an abstract bust of a bald man and a rusty vintage car radio.

    If you live in New Mexico, you see many properties that resemble my uncle’s. My family used to point out any lot with an obscene collection of automobiles and say, “There’s an Uncle Mark house.” But, of course, we were only pointing out how unoriginal his property was in comparison to many others.

    Perhaps this dispersed community of amateur house-builders and refuse collectors shared similar dreams of self-sovereignty, which I am sure infected my uncle. Indeed, the Earthship community in Taos flourished when he returned to the US, fueling the widespread ambition for a self-sufficient, off-grid life.

    Recently, I’ve been pondering if the properties we singled out as “Uncle Mark houses” also belong to veterans. At any rate, they are coded as spaces for those on the fringe of society.

    A still life with syrup bottle women in Moriarty.
    Scattered in organized clumps or dotting the yard as solitary talismans, various colorful glass jars and jugs crouch in the grass at my uncle’s estate. Some, like this one, are full of mysterious liquids.

    At some point in the 2010s, the city threatened to serve my uncle a hefty fine if he did not clean up his property. They were enforcing a seemingly arbitrary standard of how much open-air junk the county deemed sightly. He was understandably outraged—especially because his living conditions were in line with the rest of the neighborhood—and the mandate sunk him into a depression.

    I still recall the anger in his eyes during this period. He had done his part as a citizen of this country, more than most of us. Why couldn’t the government let him live the life they had already tried to take away?

    Although I don’t remember the details, he went to court and was eventually made to comply. He cleaned things up, selling many of the rusty treasures littering his yard. After he met his partner, he continued to live on and off in Moriarty until he took up a full-time residence with her in Albuquerque. The site of his life’s work—which I have always considered a sprawling art installation piece, meditating on temporality and a war-changed psyche—was left behind, remaining unfinished.

    Linda and Mark in Linda’s art studio in their home in Albuquerque, NM, November 2024.

    Before Thanksgiving, we drove to Moriarty with my photography gear and his dog, Tako, in the back seat. On the drive, I wanted to prod my uncle with questions about the war. However, I couldn’t find the right questions. Or maybe I lost my nerve.

    In September, he had undergone open heart surgery to replace a heart valve, and our conversation veered in this direction. He told me the world appeared different to him now, but he couldn’t explain how. Recovering well after a successful surgery, he nevertheless felt that he had touched death. As a result, he couldn’t fully return to this life.

    Whatever existential crises, if any, the Vietnam War had awakened in him decades ago, they have become less colorful and important. The prominent battle he now fights deals with advancing age.

    My uncle and his dog, Tako, under a Bud Dry lamp in Moriarty.

    Physically, he still appears strong and handsome. A few years ago, he lost sight in one eye, transforming his brown iris into a milky blue blob. “I’m a husky now,” he had told me when I first saw him after this incident. His dead eye, along with the new scar tracking vertically down his sternum, only enhances his physical appeal.

    I can’t help but acknowledge that the codification of his handsomeness is directly linked to the icon of the warrior-hero—the man who, like the knightly Marine from “The Few and the Proud” ads, bears the sexy scars of an epic battle. Of course, my uncle’s scars were not received in direct combat. Yet, they strike me as the byproducts of exposure to the physical and mental catastrophe of war.

    My uncle in a partially enclosed part of his property in Moriarty with a tattered antique couch and a dangling panel of insulation.

    I wanted to capture all of these ideas in my portraits of him: how his enduring strength, paired with the breaking down of his aging body, remains interlocked with his past and who he is constantly becoming as a person. To me, his scars have finally externalized the indelible marks of the events that forever altered him.

    My uncle and a man named Jesus. Jesus is in the process of buying a piece of my uncle’s Moriarty land, located across the road from his house.

    The icy wind was snapping at us as we approached the front door of one of the structures that stood on his property. We hadn’t dressed for such unseasonable weather. Searching his pockets, my uncle realized that he had forgotten his keys, limiting us to unsheltered outdoor shots.

    I hastily tried to keep up with him as he wandered his estate. He strode quickly, endeavoring to stay warm while surveying how fast the decrepitude had blanketed his unmaintained property. The rampant deterioration cast a visible melancholy over him.

    As an amateur, I fumbled to set my camera to the right settings for good exposure. After much fussing, I squinted into the viewfinder to find him unsure how to pose. Since I was hesitant to direct him, I photographed him in his discomfort.

    Mary blessing the shards in Moriarty.

    Even under more favorable weather conditions, I would have been testing my uncle’s patience with how long it took me to adjust my tripod and flash. Just as the coveted golden hour was beginning to emerge, he rubbed his numb hands together, cursed, and pronounced that he was done. I slowly followed him back to the car, struggling to get a final shot of a plastic Virgin Mary statue blessing shards of China on a rotting plank of wood.

    “We will have to come back in the spring,” I told him as I drove us west.

    ***

    After the New Year, I found myself in Angel Fire, NM, searching for snow in a snowless ski town. Instead, I found a Brutalist chapel at the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. Built with the life insurance money Jeanne and Victor Westphall collected from the death of their son, David, the couple wanted to honor his untimely death in Con Thien, Vietnam, in 1968, with a public memorial site designed by Victor.

    The chapel at the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Angel Fire, NM, January 2025.

    In 2017, the Department of Veterans Services built a museum and gift shop next to the chapel. When I first walked into the museum, I noticed a display case with Vietnamese items, including old stamps, currency, cigarettes, phrasebooks, and dolls. It felt like a preserved 1960s travel agent’s desk. I could hear the slogan: “Come to beautiful Vietnam and experience its timeless Oriental charm!”

    A room in the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Museum where the films Dear America: Letters Home from Vietnam and On this Hallowed Ground: Vietnam Memorial Born from Tragedy are shown upon request.

    This display, so sanitized of overt violence, stung my eyes with tears, which prompted me to spot a nearby box of tissues. I soon realized that these boxes were carefully placed all over the exhibit, beckoning pity.

    While I knew what was upsetting me in this space, I wasn’t sure what the curator of the tissue boxes had hoped I would feel. The pointed tissue offerings communicated to me that we were all expected to feel the same way about this history. We were all expected to cheer for the same side, too, and I doubted the tissues were inviting us to grieve the loss of Vietnamese lives.

    I held back my tears, not wanting anyone to think they were shed for the men and women who fought for my American freedom. My tears were not grateful. If anything, they expressed how overwhelmed I felt pondering the futility of war—its senseless ruining and taking of lives—and our powerlessness to stop it. If the tissues were expressly provided for that purpose, then perhaps I would have let my tears flow freely.

    The gift shop at the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Museum.

    On the way out, a board of post-it notes displayed the handwritten messages of visitors, thanking the veterans for their service. I took a pen and scribbled the message my uncle, his partner, and I decided was the best thing to say to a veteran on the Veterans Day we recently shared together: “I’m sorry you’re a veteran.”

    A post-it note message to military veterans by a visitor to the Vietnam Memorial Museum.
    A detailed shot of a New Mexico state flag signed by Vietnam veterans at the Vietnam Memorial Museum.
    The note I scrawled to veterans as a visitor to the Vietnam Memorial Museum in January 2025.

    Find a list of all of my published works on my website here.

    1

    Recently, I found out that my uncle’s birth on May 7, 1948, preceded the day Israel became a nation by a week. As I pen these anti-war reflections, it would be remiss of me not to underline this coincidental connection while acknowledging one of the deadliest genocides in my lifetime, currently happening in Palestine. I’ve shared some of my thoughts about Israel and Palestine more extensively here and here.

    2

    Not to overlook the African, Hispanic, and Indigenous Americans who thought that joining the military would prove their rightful status as full and valued US citizens.

    Find my Substack and subscribe here.

  • Man’s Struggle to Hell and Back

    Man’s Struggle to Hell and Back

    A Book Review of Karl Ove Knausgaard’s The Morning Star

    This is a photo I took on a recent hike in the Sandia Mountains near Albuquerque, New Mexico. The gloomy landscape evokes the novel’s mood and setting in Norway.

    Whenever I finish reading a long novel at lightning speed, my immediate thought is that what I read was good because it held my attention so well. But maybe, having found it so hard to get back into reading after finishing my graduate degree in English literature, when I do find myself reading again, I scarf down the literature like a starving dog offered the blandest commercial pet food. Whether I was just hungering to get wrapped up in Karl Ove Knaugaard’s The Morning Star or found it genuinely and enjoyably captivating, I’m still unsure. 

    The Morning Star was an impulsive selection off the shelf at the Albuquerque Public Library. After lecturing myself about needing to read more contemporary fiction–to scratch a sociological if not literary itch to discover what people read nowadays–I thought, “Why not this?” In other words, it was an arbitrary decision. 

    I had heard of Knausgaard but had never read anything from his My Struggle autofiction series. I have no interest. Men’s autobiographical writing has never appealed to me, especially when so arrogantly titled. 

    Men’s writing in any genre doesn’t appeal to me. This statement isn’t misandrist for two reasons: First, misandry doesn’t exist, just like color blindness and racism against white people doesn’t exist. Second, general fatigue for narratives regarding a man’s struggle should have set in for all of us a while ago–it’s the rightful burden of having the most privileged and ubiquitous point of view. 

    We have been inundated with tales of men’s travails for millennia, from Odysseyus’s bachelor-esque boat-party adventure, to the passionate masochism of Christ, to Don Quixote’s windmill hunting, to Hamlet’s mopey theatrics, to Kafka’s cockroach drag . . . It’s not trite feminism to call out the Western canon of literature for being boring when we keep reproducing and glorifying the same things ad nauseam. 

    Well, “boring” isn’t exactly the right word. It’s hackneyed, and despite this, it is seductive as hell. We easily get caught up in meditations about the universal experiences that make us all human–affairs that survive the test of time and continue to shape the world and how we see ourselves. But therein lies the violence. This longstanding production of normativity has us believing that the struggle of the Eurocentric patriarch is the universal struggle. My struggle, which I hope is also our struggle, is having no place to escape this form of storytelling.

    Speaking of being seductive as hell, The Morning Star is about the seduction of hell and reveries of the afterlife. As a mysterious new star appears in the sky over Norway, one of the characters reminds us that the Bible refers to Jesus and Satan alike as the “bright morning star.” With this thought in mind, the plot ambiguously unfolds around the uncertainty of this celestial event as either a harbinger of good or evil, life or death.  

    Considering that mad people and ghosts continuously warn the living “you are doomed” throughout the novel, we might conclude that things are not so good. But Knausgaard’s point, I think, is that these binaries of light/dark, good/evil, and heaven/hell are murkily intertwined in inscrutable ambivalence–which doesn’t make it any less cliche. This point is underscored by scenes of literal or metaphorical purgatory as the dying are stuck between life and death or characters simply disappear from the text, having no more “life” in the plot while existing somewhere off the page. 

    Knausgaard doesn’t hide his philosophical and theological preoccupations from his readers. We might even say he’s heavy-handed. The final chapter of the novel is an essay, “On Death and the Dead,” by the character Egil, a middle-aged documentary filmmaker. The book’s “Credits” serve as this essay’s bibliography as much as the novel’s, citing Aristotle, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, and a few more great Western thinkers of death and its dance with life. 

    Man has surely been long interested in death, the devil, and the afterlife. We could cite Dante’s trip to hell in the Inferno, Bosch’s depictions of earthly sins that make the world itself look like hell, and sympathy for the devil in Milton’s Paradise Lost. Lars von Trier’s recent film The House that Jack Built is an homage to depictions of hell throughout the centuries. Hell has an undeniable literary-aesthetic appeal. It’s riveting stuff, making Knausgaard’s creepy and gory intervention into this conversation enthralling. 

    Yet, stepping back for perspective after reading the last page–which could not coincidentally be page 666–I wouldn’t argue that it’s a unique or necessary contemplation on these themes. And it lacks any obvious intellectual-theoretical innovation. 

    Rather than enticing us with novelty, the novel rehashes the traditional artistic and academic depictions of death and dying that we have always found intriguing. Moreover, it is very much obsessed with Man’s death. It doesn’t matter that many female characters focalize chapters in the novel or that Knausgaard is convincing when offering their perspectives. The parts women play at the onset of the apocalypse are engulfed in the universal idea of human experience, following the template of neoliberal Enlightenment thinking about who and what comprises the Human, which Leonardo da Vinci’s Vitruvian Man emblematizes. Visions of the devil and the afterlife spring directly from a history of Man’s contemplations of the end times.  

    Reading the blurbs on the back of the novel, critics triumph Knaugaard for his ability to capture the depth of the quotidian, glossing over the deeply supernatural focus of this book. They praise Kanusgaard for keeping us rapt by life’s banalities as if this novel were another installment of his autofiction. 

    Zadie Smith notes: “Every detail is put down without apparent vanity or decoration, as if the writing and living are happening simultaneously.” Jeffery Eugenides calls the novel “experimental,” adding that it underlines “the sheer sense of how amazing it is to be alive, on this planet and no other.” James Wood claims that the author gives “voice to universal anxieties” and that his spotlight on the ordinary is “momentous . . . because it happens in the course of a life, and happens, in different forms, to everyone.”

     In other words, Knausgaard nails the universal human experience. However, to dispute Wood, he cannot master a form of universal storytelling and reveal how life “happens, in different forms,” to everyone at the same time. For Knausgaard, life seems to happen to various people in the same way, in the same place, at the same time. It’s hard to praise him for his diversity or for making the every day feel somehow new or extraordinary.  

    If the devil is in Knausgaard’s details, then the many characters who wipe their mouths with the backs of their hands after they have a “slurp” of beer and then leave to have a piss only contribute to a canned choreography that makes reality feel more like a simulation. Despite emphasizing the life of his characters by focusing on the impending doom of their deaths, Knausgaard creates characters that read like the undead, going through the same motions of ignorant, body-having mortality while unable to live meaningfully distinct lives.

    Nevertheless, like a bafflingly addictive Netflix series, I stayed immersed in the humdrum world Knausgaard created despite his killing off more than one cat in it. By the end, I felt led by temptation into the depths of a Knausgaardian netherworld, uncertain if I was more annoyed at him or myself for this folly. Maybe Knausgaard himself is like Lucifer, a bright light you can’t look away from, suspending you between your opposing desires for something new and surprising, and old and familiar.  

    You can find a full list of my publications here.

    Subscribe to my Substack here.

  • My Embarrassing and Enduring Attraction to Taos, New Mexico

    My Embarrassing and Enduring Attraction to Taos, New Mexico

    The Big House, now the Mabel Dodge Luhan Hotel and Resort

    Before Christmas, I had the pleasure of spending a night at the Mabel Dodge Luhan House in Taos, New Mexico, and have written about it for Southwest Contemporary. Luhan was a writer and wealthy patron of the arts from upstate New York. She moved to Taos at the beginning of the 20th century, divorcing her third husband, who had lured her there, and marrying her fourth and final husband, Tony Lujan, from Taos Pueblo. Mabel and Tony spent the rest of their lives together in the “Big House,” the sprawling adobe structure they erected, which now exists as a three-star hotel and resort.

    You can find the article here.

    Taos Gorge Canyon Bridge with the dust spots on the lens of the camera I borrowed

    The article won’t tell you that I saw Santa Claus and Kit Carson serving hot cider outside of the Kit Carson Museum on Kit Carson Road. It also doesn’t mention that I was taking a photography class and was running around taking bad pictures with a rented DSLR Canon, including of the bighorn sheep crossing the hiking trails near the Rio Grande Gorge Bridge, which my grandfather helped engineer during his long stint working for the New Mexico highway department. I also made my partner pose among the white paint on white canvas in the white cube gallery space at the Harwood Museum, where the abstract expressionist work of Agnes Martin is on permanent display.

    My partner in the Agnes Martin room at the Harwood Museum

    Before retiring to the Nicolai Fechin room at the Luhan House, I went to a “Meet the Donkey” party in Talpa, a sort of artist-cowboy debutante ball for a Jerusalem donkey named Minister. Its owner uses Minister as a source of transportation, riding him down the busy Paseo Del Pueblo Sur to Smith’s grocery store.

    Minister with my partner and Minister’s owner in the background

    I also ran into old friends from Taos and met new ones, including a Palestinian woman from New York who finds herself in rural New Mexico learning about historical and enduring community irrigation systems—the same kind you see at the Georgia O’Keefe House in Abiquiu. This system fed her flourishing secret garden, which the Georgia O’Keefe Museum in Santa Fe maintains, fully restored to its former glory.

    There’s something to say about this Palestinian woman working on community water irrigation in relation to the water scarcity and the mass forced starvation of Palestinians in Gaza. But I’ll leave those dots hanging in the air for you to connect.

    Bighorn Sheep on the Western Rim of the gorge with more dust spots

    The next morning, at a long banquet table in the dining room of the Luhan House, I met an elderly woman who identified herself as a writer, proudly beaming that she was staying in Mabel’s room. Outlining her latest manuscript, a historical account of a 19th-century Virginian woman’s integration into the Swanee tribe, I nodded my head, affirming the fitness of her pursuits in relation to her affinity for Mabel.

    The Nicolai Fechin Room at the Luhan House

    Reluctantly, I admitted to her that I write as well. Instead of asking me what I write, however, she asked me about what I was reading. When I told her Second Place (2021) by Rachel Cusk, she raised her eyebrows in non-recognition.

    “It’s loosely based on Mabel and her memoir, Lorenzo In Taos–about D.H. Lawrence’s visit to this house in 1922,” I clarified.

    In her New Yorker review of Second Place, Rebecca Panovka rightfully criticizes Cusk’s simplified version of Lorenzo in Taos, which renders Tony an adopted child of uncertain ethnicity. By deracinating Tony, Cusk glosses over the complicated relationship Mabel and he shared. Mulling over the sudden rise of interest in a divisive figure like Luhan after the 2021 publications of Cusk’s novel and a new biography of D.H. Lawrence, Panovka bitingly concludes: “Not every forgotten woman is in need of a bio-pic.”

    What might be a picture of Tony Lujan in a book on display at the Harwood Museum

    Yet, when I visit Taos, immersing myself in its dramatic landscape, I find myself in a position similar to Luhan’s, wanting to establish roots here and build a creatively fulfilling life. While watching the sunsets over the mountains and hearing the grass rustle over uninterrupted prairies of undeveloped, Pueblo-protected land, no amount of rationality and education in social politics helps me see this place as anything but mystical and available to me, too.

    Returning to Taos always feels like returning home, and this desire to belong to a community that continues to grow and gentrify and push my artist friends to the brink of their ability to survive there makes me feel guilty. In my article, I write about this guilt, connected to the history of Western expansion and exploitative modernist art-making in the region.

    Mabel and Tony as found in a common area of the Luhan House

    However, in this piece, I also neglect to inform you that I lived in Taos from August 2017 to August 2018. Fleeing the East Coast, and, although I didn’t realize it at the time, also a long-term relationship and my life in academia, I joined my best friend, Damien Moreau, in Valdez on the outskirts of Taos, where he had secured a house to rent on a cliff in Gallina Canyon right next to the D.H. Lawrence Ranch.

    I’ve often referred to this year as a life highlight and consider Taos one of my favorite places to live. It’s complicated and bittersweet to admit as much, though. Damien was in a steep slide down into a depressive state that he couldn’t overcome. I watched his character radically change under the murderous magenta sunsets over a mesa dusted with minty sagebrush. In December 2019, he succumbed to his stubborn death wish. I’ve written a lot about his suicide in a secret blog that is formed as a series of missives to him. Maybe I gave you access, and you have read it. At any rate, Taos can never fully be home for me again because it no longer exists on the same dimensional plane as Damien.

    My friend, the artist Eli Walters, and my partner outside of the Luhan House before going to meet Minister. Walters lived with me briefly at the house on Gallina Canyon after Damien left to work in Denver. Later, I would follow Damien to Denver.

    Although I ceased writing to Damien directly, I still think of topics for these letters to him. I’ve, of course, been angry at him and dismissive of his sincere desire to leave this planet, thinking that he was stronger and could have endured it better than he thought. But with the pandemic, rise of authoritarianism, burning of the planet due to climate change, increased legal protections for narcissistic, comic-book-villain billionaires, and genocide in Gaza, I’m not so sure.

    Another photo of Minister

    This was not the introduction I intended to write for this article! But it is the one I have written. Although it has little to do with my essay’s contents, it feels right.

    Please find a very different exploration of Taos and its history in Southwest Contemporary here.

    You can also find a list of my other publications here.

    And, if you haven’t subscribed to my Substack yet, please do so here.

  • Read about Denver’s Inaugural Month of Video in Southwest Contemporary

    At Denver Month of Video, Experience a Medley of Video Art, Exhibitions, Performance Art, and Untraditional Cinema

    Cadence Works” by Vanessa Renwick at Galapago Space curated by Maurice and De La Garza
    “Cadence Works” by Vanessa Renwick at Galapago Space curated by Maurice and De La Garza

    Here’s an excerpt from my article in Southwest Contemporary about Denver’s Month of Video, curated by Jenna Maurice and Adán De La Garza:

    Denver Month of Video will showcase a variety of video art and exhibitions with overlapping themes of Indigenous land and culture, social and environmental justice, and the contemporaneous “aliveness” of performance art. With the help of their vast network of video artist friends and various artist-run spaces and galleries throughout Denver, viewers can find MOV screenings and events in both “top tier” locations (such as the Denver Art Museum) and DIY warehouses, such as Glob. Other venues include Galapago Space, 17th Street “Storefront,” Denver Digerati, and the Daniels and Fisher’s Clock Tower.

    Jenna Maurice for Traverse exhibition at Union Hall curated by Esther Hz
    Jenna Maurice for Traverse exhibition at Union Hall curated by Esther Hz

    MOV’s itinerary kicks off this weekend with a showcase of Colorado-based video artists at the Denver Art Museum on July 1, 2023 with subsequent one-night screenings occurring every Saturday at various locations. Many other screenings and live performances will take place throughout July, including alumni work from Signal Culture, a global media-artist residency program that recently relocated from Upstate New York to Colorado. 

    New Red Order, "Crimes Against Reality" Exhibition at RedLine curated by Jenna Maurice and Adán De La Garza
    New Red Order, “Crimes Against Reality” Exhibition at RedLine curated by Jenna Maurice and Adán De La Garza

    “We hope that MOV will provide different access points to video-based work and a home for that work to be seen regularly in Denver,” say Maurice and De La Garza about Denver Month of Video, which may become a biannual event that recommences in 2025. By that time, Denver will certainly be hungry for more simultaneous introductions to video artists and the local art spaces that display their work.

    Nicola Fornoni for an exhibition at Understudy Gallery curated by Quinn Dukes
    Nicola Fornoni for an exhibition at Understudy Gallery curated by Quinn Dukes
  • Alicia Ordal’s “Birdsmouth” at Denver’s Museum of Contemporary Art

    Viewing Breakthroughs: A Celebration of RedLine at 15 with Artist, Alicia Ordal

    Alicia Ordal stood in Denver’s Museum of Contemporary Art gift shop, waiting for me in white and mauve checkered pants. She coincidentally fit in with the merchandise, which caters to a young audience with 1990s nostalgia (regardless of how conscious they were during the 90s). The MCA’s marketing and special programs target teens and align well with the currentness of its content. Indeed, searching for one’s place in the world becomes a lifelong endeavor that contemporary artists document through innovations in visual language.

    The MCA’s current exhibition, Breakthroughs: A Celebration of RedLine at 15, showcases work from RedLine residency alums who assert their rightful place in Colorado’s contemporary art scene. I asked Ordal, one of the eighteen featured artists, to guide me through the exhibition. Ordal received a two-year residency when Laura Merage and The David & Laura Merage Foundation launched the nonprofit art center in 2008. In the historically black Five Points neighborhood, RedLine boasts an ample gallery space surrounded by open artist studios. Although Ordal currently rents a studio at TANK, created by former RedLine artists to provide their cohorts with affordable studios, her previously-occupied studio at RedLine hosts other emerging regional artists.

    Artists including Sammy Seung-Min Lee, Marsha Mack, Suchitra Mattai, and Tony Ortega demonstrate how personal, historical, and mythological symbologies articulate identities touched by immigration and cultural hybridity. Others, including Daisy Patton, Eileen Roscina, Juntae Teejay Hwang, and Rebecca Vaughan, grapple with the confounding mixture of joy and anxiety that arise from family events and, to use Patton’s critical phrasing, “re-contextualize” the past with the present.

    Right, Suchitra Mattai, “Held Still (in silent echo),” 2021

    Suchitra Mattai, "Held Still (in silent echo)," 2021

    Many pieces in the show underscore the artists’ desires to overcome the constraints of verbal language by exploring alternative ways to speak with the environment around them. These artists include Gretchen Marie Schaefer, Jeff Page, and Ashley Eliza Williams.  

    In addition to this permeating theme of communication, Ben Coleman and Trey Duvall demonstrate an interest in everyday objects, absurdity, and sound. The remaining artists, Amber Cobb, Mario Zoots, and Tya Anthony, consider language or communication alongside abstraction, asking more formal questions without erasing their backstories.

    We purposefully viewed Ordal’s piece last, first coming into view from the ground-floor balcony, looking down into the basement. “Originally, I wanted to play with the architecture of this building, which I love,” Ordal looked around her to admire the sleekly modern space created by Adjaye Associates in 2007. “But then I decided to create just one piece and put it in the basement.”

    Consequently, Ordal’s change of heart made room for Ana María Hernando’s “tulle paintings” to interact with the space.

    Left, one of Hernando’s “tulle paintings.”

    “Let’s get a picture of you,” I directed Ordal, like a proud mom, next to her piece. “It’s OK,” I said, addressing the young gallery attendant, “She made this piece. So, she can touch it.”

     “I figured from the conversation,” the attendant responded, turning her eyes to Ordal. “I really love the material you used. I didn’t realize at first that it was carpet padding. Did you mean to use it to look like marble?”

    Ordal’s sculpture, a Z-shaped octagon entitled “Birdsmouth,” looked, to my eye, as if made from granite slabs. Ordal recounted how she first saw the material when a maintenance person left it in the hallway of her apartment building. “He left it there for a couple of weeks,” Ordal stated. “But the day I finally came to take it, he showed up for it.”

    The man returned to give Ordal the leftover material, and she went to the home improvement store for more.  As exemplified in her use of this padding, Ordal conscientiously chooses materials. Often these materials are upcycled products, such as toilet paper rolls, upholstery foam, and rope. 

    When I asked her about the piece’s title, she informed me that “birdsmouth” is a woodworking joint, which she originally planned to incorporate. “I had to give the MCA a title before I made the piece,” Ordal explained. “I’m OK with the title referencing something that’s not even there, though.” Ordal’s birdsmouth-less sculpture, therefore, responds to “the [ubiquitous] boxy Denver loft” by referencing a not-even-there habitat in the city. 

    For several years now, Ordal has occupied a rare fixed-rent basement apartment in the Denver Highlands neighborhood. (Note how both Ordal and her sculpture inhabit the basement of a building.) Indeed, this historically Latino and low-income neighborhood exemplifies recent, widespread gentrification in Denver.

    Once a diverse, residential area, the Highlands now teems with expensive loft buildings, high-end restaurants, and an assortment of gyms, spas, and boutiques that cater to a growing number of white, upper-middle-class young professionals. Many early 20th-century Victorian and mid-century modern homes in the neighborhood have been demolished and rebuilt as monstrous mixed-material hybrids of glass, wood, metal, and stone.

    Echoing the architecture around Ordal, “Birdsmouth” incorporates three plastic “windows” in the top left corner of the octagon, covered by a construction-cone-orange tree branch. A wooden ladder leans against the bottom right quadrant. Caught in a dark, polluted cloud that shades the underbelly of the piece, the ladder proposes that we climb out of the muck to access Ordal’s dwelling. Moreover, the name “Birdsmouth” suggests an elevated nest. Drawing from and refuting the world around her, these elements underscore Ordal’s desire to inhabit an imagined space still rooted in the reality of a city she calls home.

    In other words, Ordal’s visual reverie holds on to utopic, inclusive futurity by providing an alternative to dystopic, segregating present-day developments. Earlier that day, Ordal showed me a blueprint for the facade of a different dream home generated on her computer. This home also repudiates the uninteresting square loft with its polygon shape. Composed of red brick on one side and yellow brick on the other, the house features a large porthole window tinted purple, a dark green door decorated with a vertical column of transparent glass bricks, and an outdoor rooftop patio. Designing structures satisfying her standards, Ordal passively resists immersion in a world of haphazard design that she lacks the authority to alter.

    “Birdsmouth” relates to a handful of other works in the exhibit that manufacture fantasy environments as expressions of existential displacement. Moreover, these constructions express desires to belong somewhere and a find home. For instance, Sammy Seung-Min Lee’s installation utilizes suitcases to invoke the estrangement that immigrants feel after establishing themselves in another country. Underneath these suitcases, Lee laid a block of reflective silver vinyl. The parameters of this mirror flooring comply with Colorado state law, which defines 100 square feet as the minimum amount of space suitable for an “adequate shelter.” Although Lee’s work draws from her own experience as an immigrant from South Korea, her installation also brings to mind Denver’s pervasive homeless population. 

    In contrast to Lee’s gloomy installation, Marsha Mack translates her vibrant private paradise through a “visual vocabulary of personal symbols.” Such symbols include Pocky boxes, a Japanese candy, alluding to her nostalgia for visiting Asian supermarkets as a half-Vietnamese child.  Backdrops of lush jungle waterfalls hang behind her ceramic sculptures of delicate, feminine hands in balletic mudras, fruit rendered as jewelry, a pair of black swans in a clamshell. . .  pieces that would be at home on a vanity set in a girly bedroom. Indeed, Mack takes up an entire room in the museum, adding to the work’s voyeuristic pleasure by granting us exclusive access to someone else’s Eden. 

    In this continuum, “Birdsmouth” lies between Lee’s dreary display of transience and alienation and Mack’s baroque fantasy. Moreover, while Ordal’s longing for home (a place of solace, ample space, security, and acceptance) does not arise from experiences of being biracial or an immigrant, her attention to it highlights its universal elusiveness. Denver, too, seems to grow more inhospitable for artists who cannot afford to live and work here, for immigrants who feel exoticized, for women who feel unsafe, for people of color brutalized by the police, for families torn apart by gun violence . . . For one reason or another, this city pushes everyone out.

    These ideas doggedly pursued us as we left the MCA for RedLine in a hotspot of homeless encampments. Its current exhibition, a retrospective on Denver-based photographer Mark Sink, opened on April 1st, 2023. Coming to a wall of “wetplates,” photographs made by pouring collodion on a glass or tin plate before adding silver nitrate, we recognized our friends from the Denver art scene. “Here’s you!” I exclaimed in front of Ordal’s picture. “And here’s you again!” How fitting that Ordal appears simultaneously in RedLine and the RedLine show at the MCA, among her friends, where she belongs, in more-than-adequate spaces that support artists in a tough city. She may not feel entirely at home in Denver, but here is proof that she is welcomed and appreciated.

    Breakthroughs: A Celebration of RedLine at 15 opened on February 24, 2023, and is on display until May 28, 2023. Curated by Miranda Lash and Leilani Lynch, the exhibiting artists include Tya Anthony, Amber Cobb, Ben Coleman, Trey Duvall, Ana María Hernando, Juntae Teejay Hwang, Sammy Seung-Min Lee, Marsha Mack, Suchitra Mattai, Alicia Ordal, Tony Ortega, Jeff Page, Daisy Patton, Eileen Roscina, Gretchen Marie Schaefer, Rebecca Vaughan, Ashley Eliza Williams, and Mario Zoots.